Administrative Services | Information Technology Services | Financial Aid | University Communications | Student Affairs

Human Resources

February 2007

HR Advisory Group - Meeting Minutes

Attended:          Barbara Lay, Edwin Best, Belinda Carr, Lynn McIlyer, Laurie McKenzie-Crane, John McOsker, Sharon O'Reilly, Linda Payne, Sheryl Pustay, Sally Scheiderer

Scribe:             Sally Scheiderer

Cc:                  Seth Patton, Jim Ables

New Business

1.   Security Representative - Barbara introduced John McOsker as the new security representative. 

2.   Funeral Leave Policy - An employee requested that grandchild be added to the list of immediate family in the funeral leave policy.  They felt that a grandchild is as close a relationship as a half-sister, half-brother, step-father, step-mother, current father-in-law, and current mother-in-law.  The committee felt this was a good addition to the list.  The committee also discussed the possibility of adding legal guardian to the list.  This phrase would cover the fact that someone may be raised by a person other than the biological parent. 

A representative asked if employees must sign a form stating they have read the handbook, and the answer was that employees must sign a form printed in the front of the handbook stating that they have received a copy, and return it to HR, but not that they have read the handbook.

3.   Wage and Salary Questions - One representative asked how long it would take for an employee to get to the middle of the wage range.  It appears that each year the mid-point gets raised when the wage range increases.  Service trades have steps of salary increase, but SOS staff has a range.   It was pointed out that service trades people make the same amount after four years as someone that has been at Denison for many years.  There are no extras or benefits given for loyalty to Denison after four years.  Barbara said that she would have to research this issue.  She did not have an answer for how long it would take a person to reach the mid-point of their wage range.  

The question of differential pay for second or third shift employees was also discussed.  Currently there is no difference in pay between first and third shifts, and one representative questioned whether this could be an option or question to be considered.  The committee was uncertain if this question has been raised before or whether a proposal has ever been submitted to the administration.  The policy might consider something like a twenty-five cent differential between first and second shifts, and possibly a fifty cent differential between first and third shifts.  Some shifts work so many days on first shift, then so many days on night shift.  Others regularly work day or night shift, but are moved from one shift to another for summer work. 

The issue of unused sick leave arose again.  Currently an employee receives 75 days of unused sick leave upon retirement.  Could this be raised to half the unused sick leave hours? Would this provide an incentive for people not to abuse their benefit? Could there be a sick leave bank for unused hours?    Barbara stated that doing this is not something that the Human Resource Office is looking at right now.  One representative asked how far this issue has gone with the administration.  Does the conversation from the HRAG meetings go to Jim, Seth, or Dale?  Barbara discusses with Jim issues raised in HRAG.  Jim will discuss items with Seth as appropriate.  Some issues and proposals are shared with Dale as well.  The representative asked how the committee would know if an issue was taken to the top of the ladder before it was denied, and Barbara said that question would specifically have to be asked to Seth.  She knows that policies have been taken to Dale because some of them have to have an aye or nay.  She felt that Dale did not know everything that went on in this committee, but he would be aware of the committee as an active participant in the community.  The committee felt that sick leave policy issues would have to be discussed with the Trustees.  The committee asked Barbara to check on whether the Board has considered the issue of paying for all sick leave an employee has not used, instead of just a partial amount.  If it has not gone to the Board in the past, can it be proposed to them?  There was discussion, again, about how some people misuse their sick leave time.  The benefit is for something catastrophic that happens to an employee or family.   As an employer, this is a benefit that does not have to be offered to employees.  Some felt that misuse of sick leave should be an issue handled by supervisors, and others felt that supervisors were not dealing with employees that misused their leave.  The committee felt that the underlying problem is that too many people are turning their heads to people that are misusing the benefit.

One representative asked how decisions were made about adding staff.  There have been all kinds of endowments given to add buildings to the campus, but the representative believed there was not enough staff (building maintenance, plumbers, security, etc.) to maintain those buildings.  Does the management think about these issues when raising money or designing buildings?  Barbara stated that the administration would give this some thought when determining budgets.  The committee pointed out that several services are hired from the outside.  An outside company provides some of the painting, mechanics or heating/cooling services.  Some thought that having someone on campus that would provide these services would be cheaper for the University.

Updates

1.   SOS Handbook Policy Changes - The Human Resource office is continuing to make changes to the SOS Handbook to be in line with the Administration Handbook.  In some instances there will be changes in policy or procedure, and in others HR is attempting to mirror what is in the Administrative Handbook.

a. Employment of Relatives.  It was suggested that grandchild and legal guardian be added to this list of relatives to be the same as the funeral leave policy.  The policy changes are being made to mirror the Administrative Handbook.

b. Nondiscrimination Policy.  There were no major changes made to this policy. The Office of Institutional Equity and Diversity has been changed from Affirmative Action Office.  The contact information has also been listed. 

c. Acceptable Use Policy for Computer Use.  This policy was not listed in the SOS Handbook before, and it is in the Administration Handbook. 

2.   Thanks to Laurie McKenzie-Crane for bringing ginger cake to the meeting.

Next Meeting

The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, March 7, 2007, at 9 a.m. in Burton Morgan 317.